June 13, 2025

Jo Mai Asian Culture

Embrace Artistry Here

A scientometric review of cultural heritage management and sustainable development through evolutionary perspectives

A scientometric review of cultural heritage management and sustainable development through evolutionary perspectives
  • Jureniene, V. & Radzevičius, M. Models of cultural heritage management. Transform. Bus. Econ. 13, 236–256 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosagrahar, J., Soule, J., Girard, L. F. & Potts, A. Cultural heritage, the UN sustainable development goals, and the new urban agenda. BDC Boll. Cent. Calza Bini 16, 37–54 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kudumovic, L. Sustainability of the Palestinian historic village of Battir. J. Cult. Herit. Manag. Sustain. Dev. 13, 28–42 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Soini, K. & Birkeland, I. Exploring the scientific discourse on cultural sustainability. Geoforum 51, 213–223 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO, F. Framework for cultural statistics, (2009).

  • Nurse, K. Culture as the fourth pillar of sustainable development. Small S.: Econ. Rev. Basic Stat. 11, 28–40 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandarin, F. & Van Oers, R. Reconnecting the city: The historic urban landscape approach and the future of urban heritage. 129–159 (John Wiley & Sons, 2014).

  • Zhang, X., Zhou, L., Wu, Y., Skitmore, M. & Deng, Z. Resolving the conflicts of sustainable world heritage landscapes in cities: Fully open or limited access for visitors? Habitat Int 46, 91–100 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C.-F. & Chen, F.-S. Experience quality, perceived value, satisfaction and behavioral intentions for heritage tourists. Tour. Manag. 31, 29–35 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Amirtahmasebi, R. & Licciardi, G. The economics of uniqueness : investing in historic city cores and cultural heritage assets for sustainable development, (2012).

  • Larsen, P. B. & Logan, W. World Heritage and Sustainable Development: New Directions in World Heritage Management. 270-323 (Routledge, 2018).

  • Bogyay, K. Culture: Key to Sustainable Development, The Hangzhou International Congress, (2013).

  • Throsby, D. In A Handbook of Cultural Economics (ed R. Towse) 22, 183-186 (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2003).

  • Axelsson, R. et al. Social and cultural sustainability: criteria, indicators, verifier variables for measurement and maps for visualization to support planning. Ambio 42, 215–228, (2013).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Oers, R. V. In Perceptions of Sustainability in Heritage Studies (ed Albert Marie-Theres) 189-202 (De Gruyter, 2015).

  • Sowińska-Świerkosz, B. Review of cultural heritage indicators related to landscape: Types, categorisation schemes and their usefulness in quality assessment. Ecol. Indic. 81, 526–542 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Qiu, Q., Zuo, Y. & Zhang, M. Intangible cultural heritage in tourism: Research review and investigation of future agenda. Land 11, 139 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghahramani, L., McArdle, K. & Fatorić, S. Minority Community Resilience and Cultural Heritage Preservation: A Case Study of the Gullah Geechee Community. Sustainability 12, 2266 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzmán, P., Roders, A. P. & Colenbrander, B. Measuring links between cultural heritage management and sustainable urban development: An overview of global monitoring tools. Cities 60, 192–201 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hølleland, H., Skrede, J. & Holmgaard, S. B. Cultural Heritage and Ecosystem Services: A Literature Review. Conserv. Manag. Archaeol. Sites 19, 210–237, (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira Roders, A. & Van Oers, R. Bridging cultural heritage and sustainable development. J. Cult. Herit. Manag. Sustain. Dev. 1, 5–14 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mongeon, P. & Paul-Hus, A. The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics 106, 213–228, (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A. & Pappas, G. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J. : Off. Publ. Federat. Am. Soc. Exp. Biol. 22, 338–342, (2008).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkle, C., Pendlebury, D. A., Schnell, J. & Adams, J. J. Q. S. S. Web Sci. a data source Res. Sci. Sch. Act. 1, 363–376 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, J. Y. et al. A comprehensive search string informed by an operational definition of complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine for systematic bibliographic database search strategies. BMC Complement Med Ther. 22, 1–8 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Su, X., Li, X. & Kang, Y. A bibliometric analysis of research on intangible cultural heritage using CiteSpace. Sage Open 9, 2158244019840119 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Moher, D. et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (Chinese edition). J. Integr. Med. 7, 889–896 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolis, I., Sigahi, T. F. A. C., Thatcher, A., Saltorato, P. & Morioka, S. N. Contribution of ergonomics and human factors to sustainable development: a systematic literature review. Ergonomics 66, 303–321 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaviria-Marin, M., Merigó, J. M. & Baier-Fuentes, H. Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 140, 194–220 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, F., Dai, X. & Huang, Y. The Analysis of Evolutionary Path of Research Topics on the Field of Visualization of International Cultural Heritage Information Since the 21st Century. E3S Web Conf. 236, 05074, (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Eugene Garfield, I. H. S. & Richard, J. Torpie. Use Cit. Data Writ. Hist. Sci. Isis 56, 487–487, (1965).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Aria, M. & Cuccurullo, C. bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J. Informetr. 11, 959–975, (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N. & Lim, W. M. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. J. Bus. Res 133, 285–296 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Cenci, J., Becue, V., Koutra, S. & Ioakimidis, C. Recent Evolution of Research on Industrial Heritage in Western Europe and China Based on Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability 12, 5348, (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobo, M. J., López‐Herrera, A. G., Herrera‐Viedma, E. & Herrera, F. SciMAT: A new science mapping analysis software tool. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 63, 1609–1630 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, S. C. H. Keeping the wetland wet: How to integrate natural and cultural heritage preservation (The sustainable development of eco-tourism and cultural tourism in Hong Kong). Mus. Int 56, 29–37 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrod, B. & Fyall, A. Managing heritage tourism. Ann. Tour. Res 27, 682–708, (2000).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dauvin, J. C. et al. Legal tools for preserving France’s natural heritage through integrated coastal zone management. Ocean Coast Manag. 47, 463–477, (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, J., Zhao, Y. T., Xu, H. Q. & Yu, H. A framework for selecting indicators to assess the sustainable development of the natural heritage site. J. Mt. Sci. 4, 321–330, (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wurz, S. & Hendrik, Vd. M. Gauging site sensitivity for sustainable archaeotourism in the Western Cape Province of South Africa. S. Afr. Archaeol. Bull. 60, 10–19 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • ICOMOS, A. Québec Declaration on the Preservation of the Spirit of Place. International Journal of Cultural Property 14, 393-396, (2008).

  • ICOMOS. The ICOMOS charter for the interpretation and presentation of cultural heritage sites. International Journal of Cultural Property 15, 377-383 (2008).

  • Aslan, Z. Education and Professionalization for Heritage Conservation in the Arab Region: Review of Current Status and Strategic Directions. Conserv. Manag. Archaeol. Sites 16, 117–130, (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nocca, F. The Role of Cultural Heritage in Sustainable Development: Multidimensional Indicators as Decision-Making Tool. Sustainability 9, 1882 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, W. et al. Geoinformatics for the conservation and promotion of cultural heritage in support of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 142, 389–406, (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Anttiroiko, N. et al. Detecting the Archaeological Traces of Tar Production Kilns in the Northern Boreal Forests Based on Airborne Laser Scanning and Deep Learning. Remote Sens 15, 20, (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, X., Li, P. Z. & Seekamp, E. Sustainable Adaptation Planning for Cultural Heritage in Coastal Tourism Destinations Under Climate Change: A Mixed-Paradigm of Preservation and Conservation Optimization. J. Travel Res. 63, 215–233, (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhati, H. V. & Epstein, Y. Protection of Biocultural Heritage in the Anthropocene: Towards Reconciling Natural, Cultural, Tangible and Intangible Heritage. J. Environ. Law 35, 353–375, (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, Z. et al. Mapping the knowledge of traffic collision Reconstruction: A scientometric analysis in CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and SciMAT. Sci. Justice 63, 19–37, (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, T. Spatial approaches to a circular economy: Determining locations and scales of closing material loops using geographic data. A+ BE|. Architec. Built Environ. 20, 1–230 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. Tourism impacts continuity of World Heritage List inscription and sustainable management of Hahoe village, Korea: A case study of changes in tourist perceptions. Sustainability 11, 2573 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission, E. The European Green Deal. Eur. Comm, (2019).

  • Chen, C.-S., Chiu, Y.-H. & Tsai, L. Evaluating the adaptive reuse of historic buildings through multicriteria decision-making. Habitat Int 81, 12–23, (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mısırlısoy, D. & Günçe, K. Adaptive reuse strategies for heritage buildings: A holistic approach. Sustain Cities Soc. 26, 91–98, (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nations, U. Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. 41 (United Nations, New York, 2015).

  • Foster, G. Circular economy strategies for adaptive reuse of cultural heritage buildings to reduce environmental impacts. Resour. Conserv Recy 152, 104507, (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nocca, F., De Toro, P. & Voysekhovska, V. Circular economy and cultural heritage conservation: a proposal for integrating Level (s) evaluation tool. Aestimum 78, 105–143 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosone, M., De Toro, P., Fusco Girard, L., Gravagnuolo, A. & Iodice, S. Indicators for Ex-Post Evaluation of Cultural Heritage Adaptive Reuse Impacts in the Perspective of the Circular Economy. Sustainability 13, 4759 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Vardopoulos, I. et al. An Integrated SWOT-PESTLE-AHP Model Assessing Sustainability in Adaptive Reuse Projects. Appl. Sci. 11, 7134 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, R., Liu, G., Zhou, J. & Wang, J. Identifying the critical stakeholders for the sustainable development of architectural heritage of tourism: From the perspective of China. Sustainability 11, 1671 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Vardopoulos, I. Critical sustainable development factors in the adaptive reuse of urban industrial buildings. A fuzzy DEMATEL approach. Sustain Cities Soc. 50, 101684 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucchi, E. Review of preventive conservation in museum buildings. J. Cult. Herit. 29, 180–193, (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Fatorić, S. & Seekamp, E. Are cultural heritage and resources threatened by climate change? A systematic literature review. Clim. Change 142, 227–254, (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzman, P., Fatorić, S. & Ishizawa, M. Monitoring Climate Change in World Heritage Properties: Evaluating Landscape-Based Approach in the State of Conservation System. Climate 8, 39 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, D., Liang, Z. & Ritchie, B. W. Residents’ social dilemma in sustainable heritage tourism: the role of social emotion, efficacy beliefs and temporal concerns. J. Sustain Tour. 28, 1782–1804, (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, M. et al. ART-RISK 3.0 a fuzzy—based platform that combine GIS and expert assessments for conservation strategies in cultural heritage. J. Cult. Herit. 55, 263–276, (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirvani Dastgerdi, A. et al. Climate change risk reduction in cultural landscapes: Insights from Cinque Terre and Waterloo. Land Use Policy 123, 106359, (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention. (2012).

  • Buckley, R. Tourism and Natural World Heritage: A Complicated Relationship. J. Travel Res. 57, 563–578, (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nian, S. et al. How Outstanding Universal Value, Service Quality and Place Attachment Influences Tourist Intention Towards World Heritage Conservation: A Case Study of Mount Sanqingshan National Park, China. Sustainability 11, 3321 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz-Andreu, M. Heritage Values and the Public. J. Community Archaeol. Herit. 4, 2–6, (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, T. Beyond Eurocentrism? Heritage conservation and the politics of difference. Int. J. Herit. Stud. 20, 123–137 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. Wrestling with the social value of heritage: Problems, dilemmas and opportunities. J. Community Archaeol. Herit. 4, 21–37 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nian, S., Li, D., Zhang, J., Lu, S. & Zhang, X. Stimulus-Organism-Response Framework: Is the Perceived Outstanding Universal Value Attractiveness of Tourists Beneficial to World Heritage Site Conservation? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 20, 1189 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nian, S., Chen, M., Zhang, X., Li, D. & Ren, J. How Outstanding Universal Value Attractiveness and Tourism Crowding Affect Visitors’ Satisfaction? Behav. Sci. 13, 112 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nian, S., Liu, F., Chen, M. & Cheng, G. Satisfaction of Tourism Communities in World Heritage Sites Based on Residents’ Perceptions—Study Area of Mount Sanqingshan National Park, PRC. Sustainability 15, 533 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y., Xue, L. & Jones, T. E. Tourism-enhancing effect of World Heritage Sites: Panacea or placebo? A meta-analysis. Ann. Tour. Res 75, 29–41 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., Krishnamurthy, S., Pereira Roders, A. & van Wesemael, P. Community participation in cultural heritage management: A systematic literature review comparing Chinese and international practices. Cities 96, 102476, (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E. & Herrera, F. An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field. J. Informetr. 5, 146–166 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M., Courtial, J. P. & Laville, F. Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemsitry. Scientometrics 22, 155–205 (1991).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Buendia, N., Moyano-Fuentes, J., Maqueira-Marín, J. M. & Cobo, M. J. 22 Years of Lean Supply Chain Management: a science mapping-based bibliometric analysis. Int. J. Prod. Res. 59, 1901–1921 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yung, E. H. K., Zhang, Q. & Chan, E. H. Underlying social factors for evaluating heritage conservation in urban renewal districts. Habitat Int 66, 135–148 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Capello, R., Cerisola, S. & Perucca, G. Cultural heritage, creativity, and local development: A scientific research program. Regeneration of the built environment from a circular economy perspective, 11-19 (2020).

  • Daldanise, G. Innovative strategies of urban heritage management for sustainable local development. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 223, 101–107 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Balkyte, A. & Tvaronavičiene, M. Perception of competitiveness in the context of sustainable development: facets of “sustainable competitiveness”. J. Bus. Econ. Manag. 11, 341–365 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mogomotsi, G. E. J., Mogomotsi, P. K., Gondo, R. & Madigele, T. J. Community participation in cultural heritage and environmental policy formulation in Botswana. Chin. J. Popul. Resour. Environ. 16, 171–180 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Katapidi, I. Heritage policy meets community praxis: Widening conservation approaches in the traditional villages of central Greece. J. Rural Stud. 81, 47–58 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdul Aziz, N. A., Mohd Ariffin, N. F., Ismail, N. A. & Alias, A. Community participation in the importance of living heritage conservation and its relationships with the community-based education model towards creating a sustainable community in Melaka UNESCO world heritage site. Sustainability 15, 1935 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Younas, S. & Gulzar, S. Sustainable Tourism through Community Participation in Heritage Conservation: A Case Study of Chauburji Lahore. J. Dev. Soc. Sci. 3, 1102–1110 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Parviainen, J. Cultural heritage and biodiversity in the present forest management of the boreal zone in Scandinavia. J. Res. 20, 445–452 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Catibog-Sinha, C. Sustainable forest management: heritage tourism, biodiversity, and upland communities in the Philippines. J. Herit. tour. 6, 341–352 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Agnoletti, M. & Santoro, A. Cultural values and sustainable forest management: The case of Europe. J. Res. 20, 438–444 (2015).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Roe, M. & Taylor, K. in New cultural landscapes 1-23 (Routledge, 2014).

  • Al-Sakkaf, A., Zayed, T. & Bagchi, A. A review of definition and classification of heritage buildings and framework for their evaluation. Scientific Committee, 194 (2020).

  • Benhamou, F. Heritage. Third Edition edn, 279-286 (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020).

  • Taher Tolou Del, M. S., Saleh Sedghpour, B. & Kamali Tabrizi, S. The semantic conservation of architectural heritage: the missing values. Herit. Sci. 8, 70 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Borri, A. & Corradi, M. Architectural heritage: A discussion on conservation and safety. Heritage 2, 631–647 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, J. The Cultural Values Model: An integrated approach to values in landscapes. Landsc. Urban Plann 84, 127–139 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nocca, F. & Girard, L. F. Towards an integrated evaluation approach for cultural urban landscape conservation/regeneration. Region 5, 33–51 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, E. Consuming nature–producing heritage: Aspects on conservation, economical growth and community participation in a forested, sparsely populated area in Sweden. Int. J. Herit. Stud. 15, 540–559 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinbira, I. A. Conservation of the urban heritage to conserve the sense of place, a case study Misurata City, Libya. Am. Trans. Eng. Appl. Sci. 1, 253–264 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Saviano, M., Di Nauta, P., Montella, M. M. & Sciarelli, F. Managing protected areas as cultural landscapes: The case of the Alta Murgia National Park in Italy. Land Use Policy 76, 290–299 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, F. The practice and exploration on the establishment of national park system in China. Int. J. Geoheritage Parks 6, 1–16 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Perera, P., Senevirathna, M. C. & Vlosky, R. P. Recreationist perspectives, attitudes, and perceptions towards national park management in Sri Lanka. Tour.: Int. Interdiscip. J. 63, 497–514 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Puncello, I. & Karwacka, E. The Importance of an Integrated Historical Analysis for the Preservation of Cultural Heritage Monumental Buildings: The Case Study of Certosa Di Calci. Int. J. Archit. Herit. 17, 1542–1570 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mualam, N. & Alterman, R. Architecture is not everything: A multi-faceted conceptual framework for evaluating heritage protection policies and disputes. Int. J. Cultural Policy 26, 291–311 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva, H. E. & Henriques, F. M. The impact of tourism on the conservation and IAQ of cultural heritage: The case of the Monastery of Jerónimos (Portugal). Build. Environ. 190, 107536 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, G. & Kreinin, H. A review of environmental impact indicators of cultural heritage buildings: A circular economy perspective. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 043003 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghirardello, L., Walder, M., de Rachewiltz, M. & Erschbamer, G. Cultural sustainability from the local perspective: The example of transhumance in South Tyrol. Sustainability 14, 9052 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, S., Liang, J., Su, X., Chen, Y. & Wei, Q. Research on global cultural heritage tourism based on bibliometric analysis. Herit. Sci. 11, 139 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Champion, E. & Rahaman, H. 3D digital heritage models as sustainable scholarly resources. Sustainability 11, 2425 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Karatzas, S., Lazari, V., Fouseki, K., Pracchi, V. N. & Balaskas, E. Digital twins-enabled heritage buildings management through social dynamics. J. Cult. Herit. Manag. Sustain. Dev. (2024).

  • Harbiankova, A., Scherbina, E. & Budzevich, M. Exploring the significance of Heritage preservation in enhancing the settlement system resilience. Sustainability 15, 15251 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Caust, J. & Vecco, M. Is UNESCO World Heritage recognition a blessing or burden? Evidence from developing Asian countries. J. Cult. Herit. 27, 1–9 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nations, U. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development :note. (UN, New York, 1987).

  • Pessoa, J., Deloumeaux, L. & Ellis, S. UNESCO framework for cultural statistics. J. Cult. Econ. 5 (2009).

  • Girard, L. F., Gravagnuolo, A., Nocca, F., Angrisano, M. & Bosone, M. Towards an economic impact assessment framework for Historic Urban Landscape conservation and regeneration projects. BDC Boll. Cent. Calza Bini 15, 265–293 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijkamp, P. Economic valuation of cultural heritage. Econ. uniqueness: Invest. historic city cores cultural Herit. assets Sustain. Dev. 75, 75–103 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morandotti, M., Besana, D. & Cinieri, V. The sustainable management of the historical buildings. (2013).

  • Loulanski, T. & Loulanski, V. The sustainable integration of cultural heritage and tourism: A meta-study. 19, 837-862 (2011).

  • Nana Ato Arthur, S. & Victor Mensah, J. Urban management and heritage tourism for sustainable development: The case of Elmina Cultural Heritage and Management Programme in Ghana. 17, 299-312 (2006).

  • Bramwell, B. et al. Participative planning and governance for sustainable tourism. 35, 239-249 (2010).

  • Obad Šćitaroci, M. & Bojanić Obad Šćitaroci, B. in Cultural Urban Heritage: Development, Learning and Landscape Strategies (eds M. Obad Šćitaroci, B. Bojanić Obad Šćitaroci, & A. Mrđa) 457-475 (Springer International Publishing, 2019).

  • Nijkamp, P. & Riganti, P. Assessing cultural heritage benefits for urban sustainable development. Int. J. Serv. Technol. Manag. 10, 29–38 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Avrami, E., Mason, R. C. & Torre, M. d. l. Values and heritage conservation : research report (2000).

  • Hampton, M. P. Heritage, local communities and economic development. Ann. Tour. Res 32, 735–759 (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • UN-Habitat. The state of european cities in transition (2013).

  • Foster, G. & Saleh, R. The adaptive reuse of cultural heritage in European circular city plans: A systematic review. Sustainability 13, 2889 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Conejos, S., Langston, C., Chan, E. H. W. & Chew, M. Y. L. Governance of heritage buildings: Australian regulatory barriers to adaptive reuse. Build Res Inf. 44, 507–519, (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Homrich, A. S., Galvão, G., Abadia, L. G. & Carvalho, M. M. The circular economy umbrella: Trends and gaps on integrating pathways. J. Clean. Prod. 175, 525–543 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Girard, L. F. The circular economy in transforming a died heritage site into a living ecosystem, to be managed as a complex adaptive organism. Aestimum, 145-180 (2020).

  • Bosone, M., Micheletti, S., Gravagnuolo, A., Garzillo, C. & Wildman, A. Towards a circular governance for the adaptive reuse of cultural heritage. BDC Boll. Cent. Calza Bini 19, 279–305 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Landorf, C. et al. A framework for sustainable heritage management: A study of UK industrial heritage sites. 15, 494-510 (2009).

  • Taylor, K. The Historic Urban Landscape paradigm and cities as cultural landscapes. Challenging orthodoxy in urban conservation. Landsc. Res. 41, 471–480 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruku, S. Community engagement in historical site protection: Lessons from the Elmina Castle Project in Ghana. Conserv. Manag. Archaeol. Sites 17, 67–76 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nations, U. The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2018. (2018).

  • Farjami, E. & Turker, Ö. O. In Value of Heritage for Tourism: Proceedings of the 6th UNESCO UNITWIN Conference. Edited by Dominique Vanneste and Wesley Gruijthuijsen. Leuven: University of Leuven. 75-85.

  • Girard, L. F. Implementing the circular economy: the role of cultural heritage as the entry point. Which evaluation approaches? BDC Boll. Cent. Calza Bini 19, 245–277 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullen, P. A. & Love, P. E. The rhetoric of adaptive reuse or reality of demolition: Views from the field. Cities 27, 215–224 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Colantonio, A. Social sustainability: An exploratory analysis of its definition, assessment methods metrics and tools. (2007).

  • Nations, U. The future we want: Outcome document adopted at Rio + 20 Conference on Sustainable Development. (2012).

  • Olwig, K. R., Dalglish, C., Fairclough, G. & Herring, P. Introduction to a special issue: the future of landscape characterisation, and the future character of landscape–between space, time, history, place and nature. Landsc. Res. 41, 169–174 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Verburg, P. H., van Asselen, S., van der Zanden, E. H. & Stehfest, E. The representation of landscapes in global scale assessments of environmental change. Landsc. Ecol. 28, 1067–1080 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tress, B., Tress, G., Décamps, H. & d’Hauteserre, A.-M. Bridging human and natural sciences in landscape research. Landsc. Urban Plann 57, 137–141 (2001).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbonara, G. An Italian contribution to architectural restoration. Front. Archit. Res. 1, 2–9 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Conradin, K., Engesser, M. & Wiesmann, U. Four decades of World Natural Heritage–how changing protected area values influence the UNESCO label. DIE ERDE J. Geogr. Soc. Berl. 146, 34–46 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempiak, J., Hollywood, L., Bolan, P. & McMahon-Beattie, U. The heritage tourist: An understanding of the visitor experience at heritage attractions. Int. J. Herit. Stud. 23, 375–392 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Z. & Chen, X. The effect of tourism experience on tourists’ environmentally responsible behavior at cultural heritage sites: The mediating role of cultural attachment. Sustainability 14, 565 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Snis, U. L., Olsson, A. K. & Bernhard, I. Becoming a smart old town–How to manage stakeholder collaboration and cultural heritage. J. Cult. Herit. Manag. Sustain. Dev. 11, 627–641 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Fyall, A. & Garrod, B. J. M. L. Heritage tourism: at what price? 3, 213-228 (1998).

  • Wall, G. In Cultural tourism and sustainable local development 49-64 (Routledge, 2016).

  • Stubbs, M. & Research. Heritage-sustainability: developing a methodology for the sustainable appraisal of the historic environment. 19, 285-305 (2004).

  • Yung, E. H. K. & Chan, E. H. W. Implement. Chall. Adapt. reuse Herit. Build.: Towards goals Sustain., low. carbon cities 36, 352–361 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosagrahar, J. et al. Cultural Herit., UN Sustain. Dev. goals, N. urban agenda 16, 37–54 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashrafi, B., Neugebauer, C. & Kloos, M. A Conceptual Framework for Heritage Impact Assessment: A Review and Perspective. Sustainability 14, 27 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashrafi, B., Kloos, M. & Neugebauer, C. Heritage Impact Assessment, beyond an Assessment Tool: A comparative analysis of urban development impact on visual integrity in four UNESCO World Heritage Properties. J. Cult. Herit. 47, 199–207 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, J. Climate Change Adaptation in Natural World Heritage Sites: A Triage Approach. Climate 7, 105 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Badman, T. et al. World heritage, wilderness, and large landscapes and seascapes. (IUCN: International Union for Conservation of Nature, 2017).

  • UNESCO, W. Policy document for the integration of a sustainable development perspective into the processes of the World Heritage Convention. (2015).

  • ICOMOS. The future of our pasts: Engaging cultural heritage in climate action outline of climate change and cultural heritage. (International Council on Monuments and Sites-ICOMOS, 2019).

  • Cook, I., Johnston, R. & Selby, K. Climate Change and Cultural Heritage: A Landscape Vulnerability Framework. J. Isl. Coast. Archaeol. 16, 553–571, (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegazi, Y. S., Tahoon, D., Abdel-Fattah, N. A. & El-Alfi, M. F. Socio-spatial vulnerability assessment of heritage buildings through using space syntax. Heliyon 8, e09133, (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z., Yang, Z. & Du, X. Analysis on the threats and spatiotemporal distribution pattern of security in World Natural Heritage Sites. Environ. Monit. Assess. 187, 4143, (2014).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, J. F. What is the alternative? Impact assessment tools and sustainable planning. Impact Assess. Proj. A 21, 261–280 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloos, M. In Going Beyond: Perceptions of Sustainability in Heritage Studies No. 2 (eds M-T. Albert, F. Bandarin, & A. Pereira Roders) 335-350 (Springer International Publishing, 2017).

  • Bond, A. et al. Dealing with the cultural heritage aspect of environmental impact assessment in Europe. Impact Assess. Proj. A 22, 37–45 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardo, L., Tanyas, H. & Nicu, I. C. Spatial modeling of multi-hazard threat to cultural heritage sites. Eng. Geol. 277, 105776 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Rosales, B. et al. Risk and vulnerability assessment in coastal environments applied to heritage buildings in Havana (Cuba) and Cadiz (Spain). Sci. Total Environ. 750, 141617 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira-Lopes, P. & Pinto-Puerto, F. GIS and graph models for social, temporal and spatial digital analysis in heritage: The case-study of ancient Kingdom of Seville Late Gothic production. Digital Appl. Archaeol. Cult. Herit. 9, e00074 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • link

    Copyright © All rights reserved. | Newsphere by AF themes.