Energy transition and environmental sustainability: the interplay with natural resource rents and trade openness
Adams D, Adams K, Ullah S et al. (2019) Globalisation, governance, accountability and the natural resource ‘curse’: Implications for socio-economic growth of oil-rich developing countries. Resour Policy 61:128–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.02.009
Google Scholar
Adebayo TS, Sevinc H, Sevinc DE et al. (2024) A wavelet-based model of trade openness with ecological footprint in the MINT economies. Energy Environ 35(4):2178–2197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305×221150489
Google Scholar
Afolabi JA (2023) Natural resource rent and environmental quality nexus in Sub-Saharan Africa: Assessing the role of regulatory quality. Resour Policy 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103488
Afshan S, Ozturk I, Yaqoob T (2022) Facilitating renewable energy transition, ecological innovations and stringent environmental policies to improve ecological sustainability: Evidence from MM-QR method. Renew Energy 196:151–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.06.125
Google Scholar
Ahmad M, Dai JP, Mehmood U et al. (2023) Renewable energy transition, resource richness, economic growth, and environmental quality: Assessing the role of financial globalization. Renew Energy 216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.119000
Ali MU, Wang Y (2024) Pollution haven or pollution halo? The role of global value chains in Belt and Road economies. Rev Dev Econ 28(1):168–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.13041
Google Scholar
Ansari MA, Khan NA (2021) Decomposing the trade-environment nexus for high income, upper and lower middle income countries: What do the composition, scale, and technique effect indicate? Ecol Indicators 121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107122
Aydin M, Turan YE (2020) The influence of financial openness, trade openness, and energy intensity on ecological footprint: revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for BRICS countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(34):43233–43245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10238-9
Google Scholar
Bagchi P, Sahu SK (2025) The conundrum of porter hypothesis, pollution haven hypothesis, and pollution halo hypothesis: evidence from the Indian manufacturing sector. Clean Technol Environ Policy 27(1):205–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-024-02886-z
Google Scholar
Balsalobre-Lorente D, Shahbaz M, Murshed M et al. (2023) Environmental impact of globalization: The case of central and Eastern European emerging economies. J Environ Manage 341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118018
Bashir MF, Pan YC, Shahbaz M et al. (2023) How energy transition and environmental innovation ensure environmental sustainability? Contextual evidence from Top-10 manufacturing countries. Renew Energy 204:697–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.01.049
Google Scholar
Butt HMM, Khan I, Xia E (2023) How do energy supply and energy use link to environmental degradation in China? Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(40):92891–92902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28960-5
Google Scholar
Che S, Tao M, Ren X (2025) Climate risk exposure of global energy companies: Green chain vulnerability and countermeasures. J Environ Manag 378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124755
Chen J, Huang SJ, Kamran HW (2023) Empowering sustainability practices through energy transition for sustainable development goal 7: The role of energy patents and natural resources among European Union economies through advanced panel. Energy Policy 176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113499
Cui Y, Aziz G, Sarwar S et al. (2023) Reinvestigate the significance of STRIPAT and extended STRIPAT: An inclusion of renewable energy and trade for Gulf Council countries. Energy Environ. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305×231181671
Danis, Ulucak R, Khan SU-D (2020) Determinants of the ecological footprint: Role of renewable energy, natural resources, and urbanization. Sustain Cities Soc 54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101996
Dao NB, Chu LK, Shahbaz M et al. (2024a) Natural resources-environmental technology-ecological footprint nexus: Does natural resources rents diversification make a difference? J Environ Manag 359:121036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121036
Google Scholar
Dao NB, Truong HHD, Shahbaz M et al. (2024b) The heterogeneous effect of energy transition, environmental policies and green financial policies on ecological footprint: An OECD Perspective. Environ Model Assess 29(5):953–969. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-024-09968-8
Google Scholar
Eweade BS, Akadiri AC, Olusoga KO et al. (2024) The symbiotic effects of energy consumption, globalization, and combustible renewables and waste on ecological footprint in the United Kingdom. Nat Resour Forum 48(1):274–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.12392
Google Scholar
Guloglu B, Caglar AE, Pata UK (2023) Analyzing the determinants of the load capacity factor in OECD countries: Evidence from advanced quantile panel data methods. Gondwana Res 118:92–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.02.013
Google Scholar
Hao Y, Ba N, Ren S et al. (2021) How does international technology spillover affect China’s carbon emissions? A new perspective through intellectual property protection. Sustain Prod Consum 25:577–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.12.008
Google Scholar
Hasanov FJ, Khan Z, Hussain M et al. (2021) Theoretical framework for the carbon emissions effects of technological progress and renewable energy consumption. Sustain Dev 29(5):810–822. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2175
Google Scholar
He Y, Wang S, Chen N (2024) Mineral rents, natural resources depletion, and ecological footprint nexus in high emitting countries: Panel GLM analysis. Resour Policy 89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104472
Ike GN, Usman O, Sarkodie SA (2020) Testing the role of oil production in the environmental Kuznets curve of oil producing countries: New insights from Method of Moments Quantile Regression. Sci Total Environ 711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135208
Jie H, Khan I, Alharthi M et al. (2023) Sustainable energy policy, socio-economic development, and ecological footprint: The economic significance of natural resources, population growth, and industrial development. Utilities Policy 81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2023.101490
Kao C (1999) Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. J Econ 90(1):1–44
Google Scholar
Khan I, Zakari A, Ahmad M et al. (2022) Linking energy transitions, energy consumption, and environmental sustainability in OECD countries. Gondwana Res 103:445–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2021.10.026
Google Scholar
Kirikkaleli D, Adebayo TS, Khan Z et al. (2021) Does globalization matter for ecological footprint in Turkey? Evidence from dual adjustment approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(11):14009–14017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11654-7
Google Scholar
Koseoglu A, Yucel AG, Ulucak R (2022) Green innovation and ecological footprint relationship for a sustainable development: Evidence from top 20 green innovator countries. Sustain Dev 30(5):976–988. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2294
Google Scholar
Kouton J, Kamara D, Kouame KG-M (2022) Modelling the effects of energy diversification on ecological footprint: evidence from Cote d’Ivoire. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(21):31761–31780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17603-2
Google Scholar
Li R, Li L, Wang Q (2022) The impact of energy efficiency on carbon emissions: Evidence from the transportation sector in Chinese 30 provinces. Sustain Cities Soc 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103880
Li R, Wang Q, Li L (2023) Does renewable energy reduce per capita carbon emissions and per capita ecological footprint? New evidence from 130 countries. Energy Strat Rev 49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2023.101121
Li R, Yang Z, Wang Q (2025) Does renewable energy reduce energy intensity? A matter of income inequality. Hum Soc Sci Commun 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04439-1
Liao J, Liu X, Zhou X et al. (2023) Analyzing the role of renewable energy transition and industrialization on ecological sustainability: Can green innovation matter in OECD countries. Renew Energy 204:141–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.12.089
Google Scholar
Lu W-C (2020) The interplay among ecological footprint, real income, energy consumption, and trade openness in 13 Asian countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(36):45148–45160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10399-7
Google Scholar
Magacho G, Espagne E, Godin A (2024) Impacts of the CBAM on EU trade partners: consequences for developing countries. Clim Policy 24(2):243–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2023.2200758
Google Scholar
Magazzino C (2024) Ecological footprint, electricity consumption, and economic growth in China: geopolitical risk and natural resources governance. Empir Econ 66(1):1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-023-02460-4
Google Scholar
Nathaniel S, Khan SAR (2020) The nexus between urbanization, renewable energy, trade, and ecological footprint in ASEAN countries. J Clean Prod 272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122709
Nathaniel SP, Yalciner K, Bekun FV (2021) Assessing the environmental sustainability corridor: Linking natural resources, renewable energy, human capital, and ecological footprint in BRICS. Resour Policy 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101924
Niu Y (2024) Toward a greener energy transition: examining the effects of circular economy and carbon footprint for sustainable development. Econ Change Restruct 57(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-024-09601-4
Ozcelik O, Bardakci H, Barut A et al. (2024) Testing the validity of pollution haven and pollution halo hypotheses in BRICMT countries by Fourier Bootstrap AARDL method and Fourier Bootstrap Toda-Yamamoto causality approach. Air Qual Atmos Health 17(7):1491–1504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-024-01522-5
Google Scholar
Pata SK, Pata UK, Wang Q (2025) Ecological power of energy storage, clean fuel innovation, and energy-related research and development technologies. Renew Energy 241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2025.122377
Pata UK (2021) Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, economic complexity,carbon dioxide emissions, and ecological footprint in the USA: testing the EKC hypothesis with a structural break. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(1):846–861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10446-3
Google Scholar
Raza A, Habib Y, Hashmi SH (2023) Impact of technological innovation and renewable energy on ecological footprint in G20 countries: The moderating role of institutional quality. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(42):95376–95393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29011-9
Google Scholar
Ren X, Fu C, Jin Y (2025a) Climate risk perception and oil financialization in China: Evidence from a time-varying Granger model. Res Int Bus Finance 74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102662
Ren X, Li W, Duan K et al. (2025b) Carbon risk and debt financing: An international perspective. J Int Money Finance 153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2025.103294
Ren X, Li W, Li Y (2024) Climate risk, digital transformation and corporate green innovation efficiency: Evidence from China. Technol Forecast Socl Change 209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123777
Safi A, Haseeb M, Islam M et al. (2023) Can sustainable resource management overcome geopolitical risk? Resour Policy 87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104270
Sovacool BK (2016) How long will it take? Conceptualizing the temporal dynamics of energy transitions. Energy Res Soc Sci 13:202–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.020
Google Scholar
Ullah A, Ahmed M, Raza SA et al. (2021) A threshold approach to sustainable development: Nonlinear relationship between renewable energy consumption, natural resource rent, and ecological footprint. J Environ Manage 295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113073
Ulucak R, Danish, Ozcan B (2020) Relationship between energy consumption and environmental sustainability in OECD countries: The role of natural resources rents. Resour Policy 69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101803
Usman M, Makhdum MSA, Kousar R (2021) Does financial inclusion, renewable and non-renewable energy utilization accelerate ecological footprints and economic growth? Fresh evidence from 15 highest emitting countries. Sustain Cities Soc 65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102590
Virjan D, Popescu CR, Pop I et al.(2023) Energy transition and sustainable development at the level of the European Union. Amfiteatru Econ 25(63):429–446. https://doi.org/10.24818/ea/2023/63/429
Google Scholar
Wang Q, Li Y, Li R (2025a) Integrating artificial intelligence in energy transition: A comprehensive review. Energy Strate Reviews 57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2024.101600
Wang Q, Ren F, Li R (2024a) Geopolitics and energy security: a comprehensive exploration of evolution, collaborations, and future directions. Hum Soc Sci Commun 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03507-2
Wang Q, Wang X, Li R (2024b) Geopolitical risks and energy transition: the impact of environmental regulation and green innovation. Hum Soc Sci Commun 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03770-3
Wang Q, Zhang F, Li R (2025b) Artificial intelligence and sustainable development during urbanization: Perspectives on AI R&D innovation, AI infrastructure, and AI market advantage. Sustain Dev 33(1):1136–1156. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3150
Google Scholar
Wang S, Sun L, Iqbal S (2022a) Green financing role on renewable energy dependence and energy transition in E7 economies. Renew Energy 200:1561–1572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.10.067
Google Scholar
Wang W, Rehman MA, Fahad S (2022b) The dynamic influence of renewable energy, trade openness, and industrialization on the sustainable environment in G-7 economies. Renew Energy 198:484–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.08.067
Google Scholar
Wang X, Yang J, Ahmad M et al. (2024c) Green energy transition, economic complexity, green finance, and ecological footprint: Shaping the SDGs in the presence of geopolitical risk. Nat Resources Forum. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.12556
Wang Z, Cao X, Ren X et al. (2024d) Digital finance and the energy transition: Evidence from Chinese prefecture-level cities. Glob Finance J 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2024.100987
Xu Y, Zhao F (2023) Impact of energy depletion, human development, and income distribution on natural resource sustainability. Resour Policy 83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103531
Yan J, Guo Y, Wen F (2025) Carbon risk and the cost of equity capital: Evidence from China. Int Rev Econ Finance 99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.103975
Yin H, Yin X, Wen F (2025) Artificial intelligence and climate risk: A double machine learning approach. Int Rev Financ Anal 103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104169
Zafar MW, Zaidi SAH, Khan NR et al. (2019) The impact of natural resources, human capital, and foreign direct investment on the ecological footprint: The case of the United States. Resour Policy 63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101428
Zhang H, Shao Y, Han X et al. (2022) A road towards ecological development in China: The nexus between green investment, natural resources, green technology innovation, and economic growth. Resour Policy 77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102746
Zhang S, Shinwari R, Zhao S et al. (2023) Energy transition, geopolitical risk, and natural resources extraction: A novel perspective of energy transition and resources extraction. Resour Policy 83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103608
Zhao N, You F (2020) Can renewable generation, energy storage and energy efficient technologies enable carbon neutral energy transition? Appl. Energy 279.
link
