Enhancing intangible cultural heritage dissemination through digital experience: an Affective Events Theory approach
Aririguzoh, S. Communication competencies, culture and SDGs: effective processes to cross-cultural communication. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 9, 1–11 (2022).
Google Scholar
Mendoza, M. A. D., De La Hoz Franco, E. & Gómez, J. E. G. Technologies for the preservation of cultural heritage—a systematic review of the literature. Sustainability 15, 1059 (2023).
Google Scholar
Lenzerini, F. Intangible cultural heritage: The living culture of peoples. Eur. J. Int. Law 22, 101–120 (2011).
Google Scholar
Zhong, H., Wang, L. & Zhang, H. The application of virtual reality technology in the digital preservation of cultural heritage. Comput. Sci. Inf. Syst. 18, 535–551 (2021).
Google Scholar
Li, N., Li, X. & Xiao, W. Intangible cultural heritage threatened-level categories and criteria. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 12, 1–11 (2025).
Google Scholar
Xue, K., Li, Y. & Meng, X. An evaluation model to assess the communication effects of intangible cultural heritage. J. Cult. Herit. 40, 124–132 (2019).
Google Scholar
Liu, Y. Application of digital technology in intangible cultural heritage protection. Mob. Inf. Syst. 2022, 7471121 (2022).
Vecco, M. A definition of cultural heritage: from the tangible to the intangible. J. Cult. Herit. 11, 321–324 (2010).
Google Scholar
Alonso González, P. From a given to a construct: heritage as a commons. Cult. Stud. 28, 359–390 (2014).
Google Scholar
Marto, A., Melo, M., Goncalves, A. & Bessa, M. Multisensory augmented reality in cultural heritage: impact of different stimuli on presence, enjoyment, knowledge and value of the experience. IEEE Access 8, 193744–193756 (2020).
Google Scholar
Yang, R. et al. Enhancing the sustainability of intangible cultural heritage projects: obtaining efficient digital skills preservation through binocular half panoramic VR maps. Sustainability 16, 5281 (2024).
Google Scholar
Guo, J. & Ahn, B. Tacit knowledge sharing for enhancing the sustainability of intangible cultural heritage (ICH) crafts: a perspective from artisans and academics under craft–design collaboration. Sustainability 15, 14955 (2023).
Google Scholar
Marchand, T. H. Muscles, morals and mind: craft apprenticeship and the formation of person. Br. J. Educ. Stud. 56, 245–271 (2008).
Google Scholar
Boiger, M. & Mesquita, B. The construction of emotion in interactions, relationships, and cultures. Emot. Rev. 4, 221–229 (2012).
Google Scholar
Wang, Q. The digitisation of intangible cultural heritage oriented to inheritance and dissemination under the threshold of neural network vision. Mob. Inf. Syst. 2022, 6323811 (2022).
Weiss, H. M. & Cropanzano, R. Affective events theory. Res Organ Behav. 18, 1–74 (1996).
Zhang P. The affective response model: a theoretical framework of affective concepts and their relationships in the ICT context. MIS Q. 2013;247–274.
Sarker, R. I., Kaplan, S., Mailer, M. & Timmermans, H. J. Applying affective event theory to explain transit users’ reactions to service disruptions. Transp. Res Part A Policy Pr. 130, 593–605 (2019).
Google Scholar
Luo, M. M. & Chea, S. Cognitive appraisal of incident handling, affects, and post-adoption behaviors: a test of affective events theory. Int J. Inf. Manag. 40, 120–131 (2018).
Lee, B., An, S. & Suh, J. How do tourists with disabilities respond to service failure? An application of affective events theory. Tour. Manag Perspect. 38, 100806 (2021).
Nisi, V. et al. connected to the people”: social inclusion & cohesion in action through a cultural heritage digital tool. Proc. ACM Hum. Comput Interact. 7, 1–37 (2023).
Google Scholar
Riketta, M. Organizational identification: a meta-analysis. J. Vocat. Behav. 66, 358–384 (2005).
Google Scholar
Yan, W.-J. & Chiou, S.-C. The safeguarding of intangible cultural heritage from the perspective of civic participation: the informal education of chinese embroidery handicrafts. Sustainability 13, 4958 (2021).
Google Scholar
Hou, Y., Kenderdine, S., Picca, D., Egloff, M. & Adamou, A. Digitizing intangible cultural heritage embodied: state of the art. J. Comput Cult. Herit. ((JOCCH)) 15, 1–20 (2022).
Google Scholar
Beardslee, T. Whom does heritage empower, and whom does it silence? Intangible cultural heritage at the jemaa el fnaa, marrakech. Int J. Herit. Stud. 22, 89–101 (2016).
Google Scholar
Agapito, D. The senses in tourism design: a bibliometric review. Ann. Tour. Res 83, 102934 (2020).
Google Scholar
Parker, M., Spennemann, D. & Bond, J. Sensory and multisensory perception—perspectives toward defining multisensory experience and heritage. J. Sens Stud. 4, e12940 (2024).
Google Scholar
Skublewska-Paszkowska, M., Milosz, M., Powroznik, P. & Lukasik, E. 3D technologies for intangible cultural heritage preservation—literature review for selected databases. Herit. Sci. 10, 3 (2022).
Google Scholar
Ye, X., Ruan, Y., Xia, S. & Gu, L. Adoption of digital intangible cultural heritage: a configurational study integrating UTAUT2 and immersion theory. Humanit Soc. Sci. Commun. 12, 1–17 (2025).
Google Scholar
Huang, Y. & Zeng, Y. The impact of visual and auditory landscapes on coastal tourism experience: applying the stimulus-organism-response model for social development. J. Infrastruct. Policy Dev. 8, 6559 (2024).
Google Scholar
Kim, S., Im, D., Lee, J. & Choi, H. Utility of digital technologies for the sustainability of intangible cultural heritage (ICH) in korea. Sustainability 11, 6117 (2019).
Google Scholar
Huang, L.-T. Flow and social capital theory in online impulse buying. J. Bus. Res 69, 2277–2283 (2016).
Google Scholar
Khan, S. N. & Mohsin, M. The power of emotional value: exploring the effects of values on green product consumer choice behavior. J. Clean. Prod. 150, 65–74 (2017).
Google Scholar
Krishna, A. An integrative review of sensory marketing: engaging the senses to affect perception, judgment and behavior. J. Consum Psychol. 22, 332–351 (2012).
Google Scholar
Selmanović, E. et al. Improving accessibility to intangible cultural heritage preservation using virtual reality. J. Comput Cult. Herit. ((JOCCH)) 13, 1–19 (2020).
Google Scholar
Csesznek, C., Rățulea, G., Defta, M., Harabagiu, F.-M. & Sorea, D. The potential for sustainable local development through digital communication and digitization of intangible cultural heritage resources in făgăraș land, romania. Sustainability 16, 1532 (2024).
Google Scholar
Mesquita, B., Boiger, M. & De Leersnyder, J. Doing emotions: the role of culture in everyday emotions. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 28, 95–133 (2017).
Google Scholar
Zeng, Y., Liu, L. & Xu, R. The effects of a virtual reality tourism experience on tourist’s cultural dissemination behavior. Tour. Hospitality 3, 314–329 (2022).
Google Scholar
Lim, S. E. Job crafting to innovative and extra-role behaviors: a serial mediation through fit perceptions and work engagement. Int J. Hosp. Manag. 106, 103288 (2022).
Google Scholar
Banks, J. A. Multicultural education: historical development, dimensions, and practice. Rev. Res Educ. 19, 3–49 (1993).
Oetting, E. R. & Beauvais, F. Orthogonal cultural identification theory: the cultural identification of minority adolescents. Int J. Addict. 25, 655–685 (1991).
Google Scholar
Han, M. The triple logic of common prosperity of spiritual life in the new era. Int, J. Educ., Hum. 3, 4–7 (2022).
Maslow, A. H. A theory of human motivation. Psychol. Rev. 50, 370 (1943).
Google Scholar
Permatasari, P. A., Rech, M., Qohar, A. & Faizal, A. From web 1.0 to web 4.0: the digital heritage platforms for UNESCO’s heritage properties in Indonesia. Virtual Archaeol. Rev. 11, 75–93 (2020).
Google Scholar
Barenboim, D. Reclaiming tangible heritage: cultural aesthetics, materiality, and ethnic belonging in the maya diaspora. J. Lat. Am. Caribb. Anthropol. 23, 113–130 (2018).
Google Scholar
Fernández-Ferrín, P., Castro-González, S. & Bande, B. Corporate social responsibility, emotions, and consumer loyalty in the food retail context: exploring the moderating effect of regional identity. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag 28, 648–666 (2021).
Google Scholar
Liu, J., Li, A., Zhu, Y. & Zhang, L. How do external environmental stimuli and internal psychological cultural identity affect tourists’ behavioral intentions in public cultural spaces?. BMC Psychol. 12, 596 (2024).
Google Scholar
Zhang, M., Guo, X., Guo, X. & Jolibert, A. Consumer purchase intention of intangible cultural heritage products (ICHP): effects of cultural identity, consumer knowledge and manufacture type. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 35, 726–744 (2023).
Google Scholar
Lin, Y.-H. & Chen, C.-L. The service experience innovation model of cultural tourism in historic districts: a case study on zhongshan road in quanzhou, fujian province of China. Sustainability 16, 3567 (2024).
Google Scholar
Zhang, B. Negotiating routes and/or roots: heritagisation of nanyin in China and Singapore, 1970s to 2010s. Asia Pac. Viewp. 64, 343–358 (2023).
Google Scholar
Wang, Q. & Witte, A. Hokkien chinese diaspora visitors’ image construction of their ancestral hometown: the role of the tourist gaze. J. Herit. Tour. 18, 768–784 (2023).
Google Scholar
Fiore, A. M. & Jin, H. Influence of image interactivity on approach responses towards an online retailer. Internet Res 13, 38–48 (2003).
Google Scholar
Chung, N., Han, H. & Joun, Y. Tourists’ intention to visit a destination: the role of augmented reality (AR) application for a heritage site. Comput Hum. Behav. 50, 588–599 (2015).
Google Scholar
Andrade, J., May, J., Deeprose, C., Baugh, S. & Ganis, G. Assessing vividness of mental imagery: the Plymouth sensory imagery questionnaire. Br. J. Psychol. 105, 547–563 (2014).
Google Scholar
Muniz, J.rA. M. & O’guinn, T. C. Brand community. J. Consum Res 27, 412–432 (2001).
Google Scholar
Porter, C. E., Donthu, N., MacElroy, W. H. & Wydra, D. How to foster and sustain engagement in virtual communities. Calif. Manag. Rev. 53, 80–110 (2011).
Google Scholar
Stokburger-Sauer, N., Ratneshwar, S. & Sen, S. Drivers of consumer–brand identification. Int J. Res Mark. 29, 406–418 (2012).
Google Scholar
Cummings, J. L. Teng B-S. Transferring R&D knowledge: the key factors affecting knowledge transfer success. J. Eng. Tech. Manag. 20, 39–68 (2003).
Google Scholar
Zwass, V. Co-creation: toward a taxonomy and an integrated research perspective. Int J. Electron Commer. 15, 11–48 (2010).
Google Scholar
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M. & Sarstedt, M. PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet. J. Mark. Theory Pr. 19, 139–152 (2011).
Google Scholar
Fiss, P. C. Building better causal theories: a fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Acad. Manag. J. 54, 393–420 (2011).
Google Scholar
Rasoolimanesh, S. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M. & Olya, H. The combined use of symmetric and asymmetric approaches: partial least squares-structural equation modeling and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. Int J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag 33, 1571–1592 (2021).
Google Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y. & Podsakoff, N. P. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl Psychol. 88, 879 (2003).
Google Scholar
Tavakol, M. & Dennick, R. Making sense of cronbach’s alpha. Int J. Med. Educ. 2, 53 (2011).
Google Scholar
Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res 18, 39–50 (1981).
Google Scholar
Henseler, J., Hubona, G. & Ray, P. A. Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: updated guidelines. Ind. Manag Data Syst. 116, 2–20 (2016).
Google Scholar
Hu, L. & Bentler, P. M. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychol. Methods 3, 424 (1998).
Google Scholar
Bentler, P. M. & Bonett, D. G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol. Bull. 88, 588 (1980).
Google Scholar
Schermelleh-Engel K., Moosbrugger H., Müller H. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. 2003;8:23–74.
Cohen S. Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States. 1988;
Hair Jr J. F. et al. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: a workbook. Springer Nature; (2021).
Efron B. Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Breakthroughs in Statistics: Methodology and Distribution. Springer; 1992. 569–593.
Henseler, J. & Chin, W. W. A comparison of approaches for the analysis of interaction effects between latent variables using partial least squares path modeling. Struct. Equ. Model 17, 82–109 (2010).
Google Scholar
Sarstedt M., Henseler J., Ringle C. M. Multigroup analysis in partial least squares (PLS) path modeling: alternative methods and empirical results. Measurement and Research Methods in International Marketing. Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2011. 195–218.
Ragin C. C. Redesigning social inquiry: fuzzy sets and beyond. University of Chicago Press; (2009).
Ragin, C. C. Set relations in social research: evaluating their consistency and coverage. Political Anal. 14, 291–310 (2006).
Google Scholar
Chung, F. M.-Y. Utilising technology as a transmission strategy in intangible cultural heritage: the case of cantonese opera performances. Int J. Herit. Stud. 30, 210–225 (2024).
Google Scholar
Zhao L., Kim J. The impact of traditional chinese paper-cutting in digital protection for intangible cultural heritage under virtual reality technology. Heliyon. 2024;10.
Salmela-Aro, K. & Motti-Stefanidi, F. Digital revolution and youth: consequences for their development and education. Eur. Psychol. 27, 73–75 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kim, K., Kwon, O. & Yu, J. Evaluation of an HMD-based multisensory virtual museum experience for enhancing sense of presence. IEEE Access 11, 100295–100308 (2023).
Google Scholar
Tewell, J. & Ranasinghe, N. A review of olfactory display designs for virtual reality environments. ACM Comput Surv. 56, 1–35 (2024).
Google Scholar
link
