The importance of distinguishing between natural and managed tree cover gains in the moist tropics
Griscom, B. W. et al. Natural climate solutions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, 11645–11650 (2017).
Google Scholar
West, T. A. P. et al. Action needed to make carbon offsets from forest conservation work for climate change mitigation. Science 381, 873–877 (2023).
Google Scholar
Cook-Patton, S. C. et al. Mapping carbon accumulation potential from global natural forest regrowth. Nature 585, 545–550 (2020).
Google Scholar
Mo, L. et al. Integrated global assessment of the natural forest carbon potential. Nature 1–10 (2023).
Gao, X. et al. Exploration of a novel geoengineering solution: lighting up tropical forests at night. Earth Syst. Dyn. 13, 219–230 (2022).
Google Scholar
Vincent, J. R., Curran, S. R. & Ashton, M. S. Forest restoration in low- and middle-income countries. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 46, 289–317 (2021).
Google Scholar
Poorter, L. et al. Multidimensional tropical forest recovery. Science 374, 1370–1376 (2021).
Google Scholar
DeFries, R. et al. Land management can contribute to net zero. Science 376, 1163–1165 (2022).
Google Scholar
Hua, F. et al. The biodiversity and ecosystem service contributions and trade-offs of forest restoration approaches. Science 376, 839–844 (2022).
Google Scholar
Lewis, S. L., Wheeler, C. E., Mitchard, E. T. A. & Koch, A. Restoring natural forests is the best way to remove atmospheric carbon. Nature 568, 25–28 (2019).
Google Scholar
Jung, M. et al. The importance of capturing management in forest restoration targets. Nat. Sustain. 1–5 (2023).
Wilson, S., Schelhas, J., Grau, R., Nanni, A. & Sloan, S. Forest ecosystem-service transitions: the ecological dimensions of the forest transition. Ecol. Soc. 22, 38 (2017).
Xu, H. et al. Global forest plantations mapping and biomass carbon estimation. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 129, e2023JG007441 (2024).
Google Scholar
Williams, B. A. et al. Global potential for natural regeneration in deforested tropical regions. Nature 1–7 (2024).
Vancutsem, C. et al. Long-term (1990–2019) monitoring of forest cover changes in the humid tropics. Sci. Adv. 7, eabe1603 (2021).
Google Scholar
Lesiv, M. et al. Global forest management data for 2015 at a 100 m resolution. Sci. Data 9, 199 (2022).
Google Scholar
Fagan, M. E. et al. The expansion of tree plantations across tropical biomes. Nat. Sustain. 5, 681–688 (2022).
Google Scholar
Heinrich, V. H. A. et al. The carbon sink of secondary and degraded humid tropical forests. Nature 615, 436–442 (2023).
Google Scholar
Philipson, C. D. et al. Active restoration accelerates the carbon recovery of human-modified tropical forests. Science 369, 838–841 (2020).
Google Scholar
Kindermann, G. E. et al. Potential stocks and increments of woody biomass in the European Union under different management and climate scenarios. Carbon Balanc. Manag. 8, 2 (2013).
Google Scholar
Chazdon, R. & Brancalion, P. Restoring forests as a means to many ends. Science 365, 24–25 (2019).
Google Scholar
Brancalion, P. H. S. et al. A call to develop carbon credits for second-growth forests. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1–2 (2024).
Jung, M. et al. The global exposure of species ranges and protected areas to forest management. Diver. Distrib. 28, 1487–1496 (2022).
Google Scholar
Terasaki Hart, D. E. et al. Priority science can accelerate agroforestry as a natural climate solution. Nat. Clim. Chang. 1–12 (2023).
Ma, Z., Chen, H. Y. H., Bork, E. W., Carlyle, C. N. & Chang, S. X. Carbon accumulation in agroforestry systems is affected by tree species diversity, age and regional climate: a global meta-analysis. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 29, 1817–1828 (2020).
Google Scholar
Gao, X., Liang, S. & He, B. Detected global agricultural greening from satellite data. Agric. For. Meteorol. 276–277, 107652 (2019).
Google Scholar
Cardozo, E. G. et al. Agroforestry systems recover tree carbon stock faster than natural succession in Eastern Amazon, Brazil. Agrofor. Syst. 96, 941–956 (2022).
Google Scholar
Parker, D. et al. Land in limbo: Nearly one third of Indonesia’s cleared old-growth forests left idle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2318029121 (2024).
Google Scholar
Xu, H. et al. Changes in the fine composition of global forests from 2001 to 2020. J. Remote Sens. 4, 0119 (2024).
Google Scholar
Dinerstein, E. et al. An ecoregion-based approach to protecting half the terrestrial realm. BioScience 67, 534–545 (2017).
Google Scholar
Busch, J. et al. Cost-effectiveness of natural forest regeneration and plantations for climate mitigation. Nat. Clim. Chang. 1–7 (2024).
Guariguata, M. R., Chazdon, R. L., Brancalion, P. H. S. & David, L. Forests: when natural regeneration is unrealistic. Nature 570, 164–164 (2019).
Google Scholar
Pande, R. Fixing forest carbon credits. Science 383, eadn4923 (2024).
Google Scholar
Balmford, A. et al. Credit credibility threatens forests. Science 380, 466–467 (2023).
Google Scholar
Olofsson, P. et al. Good practices for estimating area and assessing accuracy of land change. Remote Sens. Environ. 148, 42–57 (2014).
Google Scholar
Gorelick, N. et al. Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sens. Environ. 202, 18–27 (2017).
Google Scholar
link
